Sunday, December 27, 2009

Mars

A little over exposed, the planet diameter of Mars became visible for the first time after adjusting camera settings:




Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: Decmber 26, 2009 (22:26)
Settings: ISO 100, 0.8 sec, f/5.6

For comparison of the planet diameter my first Mars shot:




Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: November 19, 2009 (23:30)
Settings: ISO 800, 1/25 sec, f/5.6

For comparison of the planet diameter I added an image of Jupiter:




Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: August 7, 2009 (22:27)
Settings: ISO 100, 1/8 sec, f/8

For comparison the over exposed planet diameter of Jupiter:




Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: September 7, 2009 (21:28)
Settings: ISO 800, 0.8 sec, f/5.6

Friday, December 11, 2009

Jupiter: retrograde loop - animation

This animation of the 2009 retrograde loop of Jupiter is made by aligning 18 images on the star Iota Capricornus.

Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: September 7, 2009 - November 15, 2009

Mars: the red planet

My first image of Mars, the red planet:



Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: November 19, 2009 (23:30)
Settings: ISO 800, 1/25 sec, f/5.6

For comparison of color I added an image of Jupiter:



Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: August 7, 2009 (22:27)
Settings: ISO 100, 1/8 sec, f/8

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Jupiter: orbit Galilean Moons

To visualize the orbits of the Galilean Moons around Jupiter I used 11 images, taken over the last few months.

Visualizing the orbits (using Matlab software):
Step 1: Rotated each image until the orbit of the Galilean Moons was horizontal.
Step 2: Determined the position of the visible moons by measuring the distance from Jupiter to each moon in each image in pixels.
Step 3: Plotted the data: x-axis: position of jupiter and the Galilean Moons in pixels, y-axis: date & time.

Example image: november 15, 2009.

Example image: October 13, 2009.
Calculating the orbits (using Matlab software):
Step 1: Using a sinus fit through the generated data, both the orbital diameter [pixels] and the orbital period [days] of all 4 Galilean Moons can be estimated:

Io:
Orbital diameter: 58 [pixels]
Obital period: 1.7637 [days]

Europa:
Orbital diameter: 94 [pixels]
Obital period: 3.5700 [days]

Ganymede:
Orbital diameter: 148 [pixels]
Obital period: 6.9810 [days]

Callisto:
Orbital diameter: 250 [pixels]
Obital period: 16.5347 [days]

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Jupiter: retrograde loop

To make the orbit of Jupiter visible against the background stars I used 18 images taken over the last few months.

Visualizing the orbit:
Step 1: Rotated each image until the orbit of the Galilean Moons was horizontal.
Step 2: Aligned the images on Iota Capricornus, a star visible on all images.

On October 13, 2009 the more or less linear orbit of Jupiter changed into the opposite direction. I had captured the end of the 2009 retrograde loop of Jupiter!













Retrograde loop explained:

















Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: September 7, 2009 - November 15, 2009

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Jupiter & Galilean Moons

After my first image of the moon I pointed my camera at Jupiter. The result was even more impressive than my first lunar shot.

Although only 14 pixels wide, the planet diameter of Jupiter was clearly visible:





Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: September 7, 2009 (21:28)
Settings: ISO 200, 1/200 sec, f/5.6

To my surprise overexposuring the next attempt made even the 4 Galilean Moons visible!

Callisto - Ganymede - Jupiter - Io - Europa:



Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Date: September 7, 2009 (21:28)
Settings: ISO 800, 0.8 sec, f/5.6

Monday, December 7, 2009

Moon

A few months ago I curiously pointed my mirror reflex camera at the moon. I was amazed to see so much detail and so many visible craters!






















Location: Vinsobres, France
Date: August 30, 2009 (22:33)
Camera: Sony Alpha 200
Lens: Minolta 75-300
Settings: ISO 100, 1/200 sec, f/5.6

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Nefertiti, the bust. Is it fake?: 2009

The world famous bust of queen Nefertiti on display in the Egyptian Museum of Berlin.


















Her elegant and chiselled features held proud and high on a swanlike neck, she has been smiling serenely for 3,400 years. At least that has long been the popular and scientific belief that draws half a million tourists to see her in Berlin every year.

But now doubt has been thrown on the authenticity of the painted limestone and plaster bust of the 18th dynasty Egyptian queen Nefertiti by two authors who claim she is a fake.

According to a Swiss art historian, the bust is less than 100 years old. Henri Stierlin has said the stunning work that will later this year be the showpiece of the city's reborn Neues Museum was created by an artist commissioned by Ludwig Borchardt, the German archaeologist credited with digging Nefertiti out of the sands of the ancient settlement of Amarna, 90 miles south of Cairo, in 1912.


















In his book, Le Buste de Nefertiti – une Imposture de l'Egyptologie? (The Bust of Nefertiti – an Egyptology Fraud?), Stierlin has claimed that the bust was created to test ancient pigments. But after it was admired by a Prussian prince, Johann Georg, who was beguiled by Nefertiti's beauty, Borchardt, said Stierlin, "didn't have the nerve to make his guest look stupid" and pretended it was genuine.

Berlin author and historian Edrogan Ercivan has added his weight to the row with his book Missing Link in Archaeology, published last week, in which he has also called Nefertiti a fake, modelled by an artist on Borchardt's statuesque wife.

Public and political enthusiasm about the find at the time gave the artefact its "own dynamic" and led to Borchardt ensuring it was kept out of the public gaze until 1924, the authors have argued.

He kept it in his living room for the next 11 years before handing it over to a Berlin museum, since when it has been one of the city's main tourist attractions.

The statue was famously admired by Adolf Hitler, who referred to it as "a unique masterpiece, an ornament, a true treasure".

Recent radiological tests carried out on the statue by Berlin's Charite hospital supposedly proved that the bust is indeed more than 3,000 years old. The tests uncovered a hidden face carved into the statue's limestone core. But Stierlin has argued that while it is possible to carbon date the pigments, which appear to be ancient Egyptian, it is impossible to accurately date the bust because it is made of stone covered in plaster.

Other aspects of the find, which he has claimed support his theory, are the facts that the bust has no left eye, which the ancient Egyptians would have considered a sign of disrespect towards their much-loved queen, and that the first scientific reports on the discovery were not written up for 11 years.

Borchardt's diary entries remain the main written account of the find. He wrote: "Suddenly we had in our hands the most alive Egyptian artwork. You cannot describe it with words. You must see it."